Merger Control: Austria introduces transaction value-based notification threshold

On 6 April 2017 the Austrian Parliament has adopted an amendment to the Austrian Cartel Act, introducing a new merger notification threshold based on the transaction value.

Currently, Austrian merger control applies if the parties’ combined worldwide and Austrian turnover exceeds EUR 300 million and EUR 30 million respectively, and if at least two of the parties generate a worldwide turnover of more than EUR 5 million each (unless only one of the parties achieves turnover in Austria of more than EUR 5 million and the other parties do not have a combined worldwide turnover of more than EUR 30 million).

According to the new – additional – thresholds, a transaction that does not meet the turnover test will still have to be notified to the Federal Competition Authority if:

•    the parties’ combined worldwide turnover exceeds EUR 300 million,
•    the parties’ combined Austrian turnover exceeds EUR 15 million,
•    the value of the consideration for the transaction is more than EUR 200 million, and
•    the target is active in Austria to a significant extent.

The amendment aims to take account of the fact that the parties’ turnover does not necessarily reflect the potential impact of a transaction on the competitive landscape, in particular in cases involving companies active in the digital economy. Similar legislative initiatives are under way in other countries (e.g., in Germany).

The new notification thresholds will become effective on 1 November 2017.

Practical implications

The introduction of the new notification thresholds will significantly broaden the reach of Austrian merger control and will increase the number of transactions that will have to be notified to the Federal Competition Authority.

From the point of view of transaction parties, applying the new rules may give rise to various questions and uncertainties. In particular:

Determining the “consideration”

The new thresholds require transaction parties to determine the value of the “consideration” (“Gegenleistung”) for the transaction. This term is not defined in the law. The explanatory notes clarify that the consideration includes all assets and any other payments in kind which the seller receives from the acquirer in the context of the transaction (i.e., the purchase price), as well as any liabilities assumed by the acquirer.

The local nexus requirement

The new merger notification rules do not contain any specification as to when the target is active in Austria “to a significant extent”. While the explanatory notes do give some guidance in this regard (in particular, the local nexus test is fulfilled where the target has a place of business in Austria or where the relevant measure values used in the industry concerned, such as the number of monthly active users or website visits, indicate a significant activity in Austria), it may be difficult for the parties to determine with certainty whether their transaction is subject to Austrian merger control – at least until it becomes clearer how the Austrian competition authorities will apply the new rules.

In cases of doubt transaction parties are therefore advised to seek the Federal Competition Authority’s informal advice and/or to notify their transaction on a precautionary basis to avoid a fine for an infringement of the standstill obligation.

Entry into force and applicability

Parties to a transaction potentially triggering the new notification thresholds have to bear in mind that the applicability of the new rules depends on when the transaction is implemented (before or after 1 November 2017).

This may in practice give rise to questions and uncertainties, e.g., where the implementation of a transaction (that does not meet the existing turnover thresholds but would fulfil the new transaction value-based threshold) is originally planned to take place prior to 1 November 2017 but later slips to a date after 1 November 2017. In this scenario, the transaction would become notifiable merely as a result of the (changing) time schedule regarding implementation.

Therefore, it seems advisable to take the new filing threshold into consideration in any analysis of potential merger notification requirements already prior to 1 November 2017. This allows the parties to be able to exclude a filing requirement also on the basis of the new thresholds, or at least to take the necessary steps to ensure that clearance is granted in time (e.g., by adapting closing deadlines etc.)

Our use of cookies

We use necessary and functionality cookies to make our site work. We only use analytics cookies to improve our website if you enable them. By using this tool for individual settings of the cookies, we will send a cookie to your device to remember your preferences.

For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Cookies Policy.

Necessary Cookies Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect the website functions.

Functionality Cookies

Functionality cookies allow users to customise how a website looks for them: they can remember usernames, language preferences and regions. We use functionality cookies for storing your user preferences and remembering if you have been to the site before so that messages intended for first-time users are not displayed to you. These cookies do not collect information about you that could be used for marketing purposes and do not remember where you have been on the Internet.

You may disable these cookies with the button, but you should be aware that any preferences will be lost and you will have to make them again on your next visit. It is also possible that the website will not work properly or you will lose some functionality.

Analytics cookies (including US providers)

"Web analytics cookies" collect aggregated information about user behaviour to improve our website. We would like to use such cookies from Google Analytics to improve our website by collecting and evaluating information about the use of our website. The provider of Google Analytics is Google LLC, which is based in the USA. The USA is not certified by the European Court of Justice as having an adequate level of data protection. In particular, there is a risk that your data may be accessed by US authorities for control and monitoring purposes and that no effective legal remedies are available against this. By activating the button under "Web analytics cookies (including from US providers)", you agree that we may set these cookies and that you also agree to the transfer of data to the USA. You can revoke your consent at any time via the cookie settings on our website.